Over at the University of East Anglia Phil Jones now asserts there was NO PEER REVIEW of his work! So if there is no peer review, where and how valid is his so called climate ‘science’ and his so called climate ‘consensus’.
Also his claims about Swedish climate data not being made public has been exposed by Sweden as a lie. His claim that Canada data not made public is also a lie when it is shown to be freely accessible on the net.
How many more lies will UEA and Phill Jones treat us to?
And this is what the trillion dollar global fraud of AGW is based upon!