The world as we know it

Credible alternatives news to the globalist propaganda media

The following are some great blogs where you get independent views rather than the usual rehashed globalist crap. Read the real news not just the BS they want you to read.

ABC media bias; http://abcnewswatch.blogspot.com.au

Big brother watch; http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk

Exposing global warming fraud; http://www.c3headlines.com

People against corrupt government; http://justgroundsonline.com

The cold news the watermelon media ignores; http://iceagenow.info

IPCC corruption; http://nofrakkingconsensus.com

News about the sun & what the globalist media refuse to report; http://www.landscheidt.info/?q=node/50

For a much more extensive list;


Filed under: Governance, , , , , , , , , ,

lamestreammedia media utter fail

Copied from email from Malcolm Roberts. Journalism in this country is appalling, particularly as it is no longer bipartisan.

To all Federal MPs

Your dealings with some journalists have our empathy.

Here are three recordings exposing journalists’ ignorant and/or deliberate misrepresentation of climate:

1. Recording of Graham Readfearn, The Guardian and blogger:

Summary and conclusions here:

Click to access GrahamReadfearnPhoneCallNotesShort.pdf

Admits he doesn’t read UN climate reports. Yet his work relies on the reports and spreads their claims.

2. Recording of Ben Cubby, Fairfax:

Redacted personal phone number and address. Transcript here:

Click to access ROBERTS,Malcolm-InterviewWithBenCubby-30July2012WorkingCopy2.pdf

Details and observations of Ben’s behaviour are on pages 30 to 40 here:

Click to access 13_appendix.pdf

Admits knowing little about formation and background of UN climate body. Yet his work spreads its claims.

3. Recording of Wendy Carlisle, ABC: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/media/WendyCarlisleABC_BackgroundBriefingResearch_23_06_11%204_22PM.mp3
Observations of Wendy’s behaviour and propaganda is on pages 21 & 22 here:

Click to access 13_appendix.pdf

Detailed analysis here:

Click to access 13a_AppendixABCBackgroundBriefingWorkingTranscript.pdf

and here:

Click to access 13b_AppendixABCBackgroundBriefingNotes.pdf

(Both are part of this report: http://www.conscious.com.au/CSIROh!.html)

4. Mike Carlton, Fairfax, pages 30 to 40, here: http://www.conscious.com.au/docs/new/13_appendix.pdf
Video of holocaust survivor rebutting Mike Carlton’s anti-Semitic smear is here:

Mike Carlton earlier failed to provide empirical scientific evidence for his climate belief. Instead, he introduced religion, race and his “conspiracy theories” into Australian climate discussions. Such tactics are increasingly seen as diversions hiding lack of evidence.

Contrary to facts, the vicious and false implied anti-Semitic smear was spread by Graham Readfearn and Ben Cubby.

5. Detailed analysis of five prominent ABC programs and the ‘work’ of some ABC journalists is here:

Click to access 13_appendix.pdf

6. David Marr in analysis by Andrew Bolt: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/tim-flannery-has-been-sacked-8212-and-so-too-should-journalists-who-are-climate-change-scaremongers/story-fnj45fva-1226724721844?from=trendinglinks

7. Strong journalists such as Andrew Bolt can be damagingly pressured and misled by journalists’ hurtful false smears. See pages 30 to 40 here:

Click to access 13_appendix.pdf

Overview here: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/restoring_morality_justice.php#H

Despite ample documented evidence some journos fail to discuss UN and Australian corruption of climate science.
See appendices 2, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 9 and others here:http://www.conscious.com.au/CSIROh!.html

All journos and program producers who push climate alarm based on human carbon dioxide contradict empirical scientific evidence. They’re deliberately or inadvertently supporting corruption of climate science.

Are they dishonest? Or are they group thinkers? Or dependent? Or lacking strength to question what they initially perceived as the popular tide? Or naively aligned with vested interests stealing money by fabricating, pushing and/or milking unfounded climate alarm?

Given the facts and empirical scientific evidence, is their behaviour in misrepresenting modest cyclic global warming that ended in 1998 irresponsibly or negligently incompetent or is it deliberately dishonest?

Given that too many federal MPs are afraid of the media’s power, it’s easy to see many were herded into falsely accepting fabricated and unfounded climate alarm. We empathise.

Should all Australians pay the price for abusive journalism? None should. Please Axe the Tax, Drop Direct Action and hold journalists accountable.

Malcolm Roberts
Fellow AICD, MAIM, MAusIMM, MAME (USA), MIMM (UK), Fellow ASQ (USA, Aust)

Filed under: Governance, , , ,

Work from home

Join 3,409 other followers


  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Story archives


%d bloggers like this: